A Haccont
wh Rus Davies the ag. (who
The
af
secently acted as Cv stres the
54 das "seand "case)
opinion in enclorme 2.
Sure
am perfill
think juoja
that he is right that the
ong came for
A
Merh
sest on the recessity for a satisfactory County appeal.
Congestion in a
Count is not proved
д
by giving merely the number of
cases
a
lach
heard. What you
table showing
a case
was set
want is
the date at which down for tual,
date when it came
the
on
for hearing
the dating time it took
the decision. You
g the
Lo
Cam
& the dite
then so
What
the average time taken between thing down for trial o the date
the fe
the decision. If you refer to the Gron derf:
g
sections you
170813/08 56 7+ following
will find that the
bepul purfenion except Mr Slade who
18
a
great personal friend of the CT
(2) continue the Exciting system which
is unsatisfactory opinion of the
the
because CT - who may
have ties the case
must prevail
brother juose
(3) affommt a
ore
7 onginals. that g
J249
think pinge which
for other purposes is unneceway
(4) adrift cher Harding's suggestion.
д
This has the
nd at
merit of setting
and the affeal altogether staff to the Privy Council. The 2.0 only järje the Count will have
Sat originally to hear the case + no offer
in
the Goly
be possible. You therefore get rid
One
somce of congestion but I doubt if much time we be saved in the end.
Subtif
(5) you
this purje
isht
sis said to be unduly favomed oyhim, apree
that
a
Assegards the Count gaffeal
Recensary.
you may.
(1) fet in a
jusze from outride
This has been unsuccen
atterifler.
Any
full
C
bring in a
Police Maestral
as 3rd fish of the affert Ct This is rey
Jos put
Four in a
objectionable.
net Standing's suggestion to the
compl despi
arking bein to consult the & thony general
confiventuell about it & be
suided by his
view. If the he disagree,
}
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.